Categories: integral | social change | social networking
I just signed up for a Zaadz profile this week. Zaadz is a new social networking tool, geared towards folks who want to change the world. More specifically, it seems, folks who want to change the world from an integral perspective. (See my previous post for an explanation of "integral".)
For those who may be thinking "what the heck is a social networking tool?", let me explain. Basically, the term refers to the many web-based services that allow people to meet other people, usually around shared interests. Tribe.Net is pretty popular in my community of friends. Linked-In is a more professional, corporate-ish one. Dating sites like Lavalife are also social networking tools.
Apparently there are over 3000 of these on the internet now. !!!!!
So given that, you might also be thinking "Why on earth does the world need another one?" Do they really do anything besides suck up vast amounts of people's time? Well, I think there are two things that determine the value of a social networking tool:
1) the functionality of the tools themselves, and what they can allow people to do, and
2) the people who are using the service.
So Zaadz is doing some cool stuff as far as tools go - I see influences of 43Things (Zaadz's "goal" feature is very similar), and there's a whole lotta tagging going on, as well as blogging, podcasting, etc... lotsa Web2.0-ish action. But nothing mind-blowing, and the tools themselves aren't what have me excited (though I expect they'll ramp up the functionality dramatically in the next few months - they're still in very early days).
What's cool is the people who seem to have flocked to the Zaadz beta, and that appears (at the risk of making generalizations) to be the kind of "spiritual activist" crowd. The kind of people who are attracted to the Zaadz Plan, as laid out on their front page:
Ours involves Capitalism. Spirituality. Enthusiasm. Love. Service. Inspiration. Leaders. People CRAZY enough to think they can change the world. And courageous enough to do something about it. And committed enough to stick to it when they feel like giving up. The quick version of what we're gonna do: build THE most inspired community of people in the world... Imagine social networking with a purpose, a community of seekers and conscious entrepreneurs circulating wisdom and inspiration and wealth and all that good stuff. Fun fun fun.
I have to say that I was attracted to the vision.
My first 24 hours as a member have been pretty interesting, all told. I stumbled across the business model blog post and had some trouble with parts of it (as you will see from my comment if you care to click through). Brian, the CEO, immediately stepped up with a thoughtful response and a personal thanks for contributing to the discussion. I've done some additional reading since then, and I have to say that I'm left feeling very impressed with the quality and openness of the dialogue being modeled. The long and the short of it is that one member was quite put off by the openly capitalist intentions stated for the company, and posted that he was going to leave. What followed was an involved and very co-explorative dialogue that seriously left me feeling all warm and fuzzy. If we could all learn to handle conflict that maturely, compassionately and constructively, the world would be a very different place.
I'm not sure myself how I feel about the whole stated vision. But then, I'm still grappling to understand what it looks like when business, sustainability, and spirituality all come out to play together. (Anyone else have any thoughts?) Brian made some good points in his reply to my comment, but it still doesn't sit completely right with me.
Beyond all that, though, I'm really excited about the kind of dialogue that could emerge from this group of people. And I'm excited to be part of "an open forum through which we can all inspire and empower one another to more closely define our personal truth while challenging each other to actually live it." Sounds awesome....
Intriguing, but...
Thu, 2006-01-12 23:24 — Len (not verified)I loved the bit on KK's vlog when you had just received the CEO's post, and then reading about it here, like different windows on the same event. What bugs me about Brian the CEO is the language he uses. It seems forced, trying too hard for effect. This may be a shallow way to judge the enterprise, but language tells a lot. Your own, by comparison, seems genuine, not flippant or calculated. But Zaadz is intriguing, no doubt about it.
socialnetwork-verload
Sat, 2006-01-14 12:47 — bicyclemark (not verified)New guy commenting: I am hereby allergic to any new social neworking/newsreading/sharingmyblood sites. It seems no one is paying attention to what is already out there are developers keep their heads buried in the sand developing their own tools which probrably already exist in a similar form somewhere. My latest was newsvine... I have no idea why Im using it... woa is me.
facing the unknown
Sun, 2006-01-15 02:26 — Chris (not verified)Hey Sarah,
It still amazes me how quickly word spreads out here in the cybersphere. ...
I sure appreciate your post here, as well as your very forthcoming and articulate expression of concern to Bri over at Zaadz.
I think for me, in addition to being impressed by Bri's genuine candor and transparency, one of the things that motivates me to hang on and see where it goes is the value I feel in holding the tension of integrity against an uncertain climate (in this case, both Zaadz and the future in general). You also point out my own reason for logging on to this particular venue (among thousands of others) -- namely, the large amount of open-minded integral visionaries it has initially attracted.
I could care less whether Zaadz becomes the online networking version of Starbucks or not. My whole deal is just needing to network with others at the razor's edge of uncertainty given the future we're all now facing. Whatever can serve that process, is, for me, worth checking into, at least for a sustained while. Everything else is secondary.
So in this sense, Zaadz is serving as an extension of my own values, rather than vice-versa. As long as I can maintain that feeling, I'll hang on. I guess I'm left wondering if perhaps what might lend Zaadz an incredible degree of both success and integrity is if it manages to understand this principle of user-sovereignty, and to simply maximize that to an unheard-of degree.
Cyber-socialism in Capitalist guise, anyone?
goatmilk
User Sovereignty
Sun, 2006-01-15 14:37 — Brian Johnson (not verified)Hey Sarah: Just stumbled across this cool little dialogue and if I may, I'd love to poke my head in to ask Chris (et al) a question about user sovereignty:
Would love to hear your thoughts on how we "maximize that to an unheard of degree." Fun.
(I'm a little self-conscious about the language I use around Len, so I'll just sign off with: Love it. -bri :)
Amends
Sun, 2006-01-22 21:46 — Len Edgerly (not verified)Brian's comment crystalized my own regret at having made such a flippant critique of his language. It was gratuitous and uncalled for. I knew I needed to make an amend when the memory of the exchange uncomfortably surfaced today during an all-day zazenkai retreat at my local Zen Center. Nine hours of trying to let go of my thoughts helped me do some housecleaning. So, to all, my apologies.
Recent turns of events at Zaadz...
Tue, 2006-02-07 04:44 — Nerdwagon (not verified)may have you all rethinking your your comments. Zaadz has been tested by a large influx of people unhappy with Tribe and seeking an alternative. The problem was though, as badly as we felt we had it at Tribe, we never had it this bad at Zaadz. What we found were suppression of ideas, especially those that were in conflict with Brian's business plan, threatening (albeit veiled) emails, and accounts arbitrarily deleted (mis-use of the god button). Personally I don't think Brian's crew has the maturity level to handle all the discordant agendas found on the internet today. Control needs to be tempered, with restraint. It's too easy as the owner of an online community to say "I built this, if you disagree with me I will remove you." And I find his behaviour counter to every belief he espouses. They are after all just words, a far better measure of a man is his actions.
ranting and raving
Wed, 2006-02-08 19:55 — coolmel (not verified)we can rant, we can rave, but only time will tell. as CEO Brian had put it....
"It's obviously hard (impossible?) for me to articulate who we are in words. I can write all I want, but the fact is that only action will show who we are. We will either manifest our highest ideals or not and we either come from a place of pure intention or not."
as for me, i'll take the more compassionate route and be an "Optimistic Cynic", rather than the "Some Guy Told Me" approach.